CR4-DL

Catching Fire

By Richard Wrangham

Introduction

  • What made us human was our control of fire and the advent of cooked meals.
  • Cooking increases the value of our food by
    • Making food safer
    • Making it tastier
    • Reducing spoilage
    • Breaking down tough foods
  • Some think that the greatest change in evolution was the eating of meat.
  • Habilines, the missing link between apes and humans, shows that there were two changes in the path from ape to human
    • One 2.5 million years ago.
    • One between 1.9 and 1.8 million years ago.
  • Meat eating accounts for the first transition.
  • The author believes cooking accounts for the second transition.
  • But the main advantage of cooking is that it increases the amount of energy our bodies obtain from our food.
  • The extra energy allows us to have more free time and to grow bigger brains.
  • Humans are cooking apes; creatures of the flame.

Chapter 1: Quest for Raw-Foodists

  • Are humans dependent on cooked foods or is it a random preference that we evolved?
  • An experiment was run where people ate from 70% to 100% raw food and the conclusion was that a strict raw food diet cannot guarantee an adequate energy supply.
  • The subjects of the experiment started losing weight even though they were healthy.
  • Maybe the difference was that they ate less meat?
  • Among people who eat cooked diets, there’s no difference in body weight between vegetarians and meat eaters.
  • Any system that reduces the size of food particles, such as grinding and crushing, leads to predictable increases in energy gain.
  • Everywhere we look, home cooking is the norm in all human cultures.
  • There’s abundant evidence and stories of people surviving on raw food but only temporarily or eating high quality raw foods that are highly processed.
  • There’s no long term evidence, such as longer than a year, that a person can survive on wild, raw food.
  • We are not like other animals in that we need cooked food to survive.

Chapter 2: The Cook’s Body

  • At some point in evolution, our ancestors must have been able to use raw foods effectively because our primate cousins do. So what changed?
  • Evolutionary trade-offs are common are in nature.
  • E.g. Long legs make it harder to climb but easier to walk. Long arms make it easier to climb but harder to walk.
  • Similarly, our poor effectiveness at digesting raw food lets us process cooked foods much better.
  • E.g. We have smaller digestive systems compared to our cousin apes which allows them to process raw foods better at the cost of more energy.
  • Cooked food offers two advantages
    • Spontaneous advantages that almost any species, when fed cooked food, can use by growing faster and more efficiently.
    • Evolutionary benefits such as the smaller mouths, weaker jaws, smaller guts, etc. that use less energy when compared to apes.
  • It also seems like our digestive systems evolved around cooked food but is this the case?
  • Maybe our digestive system evolved to handle meat and handling cooked food was a byproduct.
  • Evidence suggests that we didn’t evolved to eat raw meat as our teeth aren’t as sharp, compared to lions and dogs, and food passes our stomach too quickly.
  • Since cooking predictably destroys many toxins, we may have evolved a relatively sensitive palate.
  • We are cooks more than carnivores.

Chapter 3: The Energy Theory of Cooking

  • Cooking increases the amount of energy we get from food by
    • Gelantinizing starch
    • Denaturing proteins
    • Softening everything
  • Softer foods provide more energy because they are cheaper to digest.
  • The effects of grinding and cooking are independent as both methods can be used together to get even more energy out of food.

Chapter 4: When Cooking Began

  • While humans have been using fire for hundreds of thousands of years, archaeology doesn’t tell us when our ancestors began using fire.
  • With the inability to use archaeological evidence to tell us when humans started to control fire, we turn to biology.
  • There are two vital clues from biology
    • The fossil record paints a clear picture of the changes in human anatomy over the past two million years.
    • Our biology changes in response to our diet.
  • Chimpanzees, when presented with raw and cooked food, always pick the cooked over the raw.
  • Why do wild animals prefer cooked foods over raw foods?
  • This preference for cooked foods implies an innate mechanism for recognizing high-energy foods.
  • Cooked foods taste better by being sweeter and less bitter.
  • The species implicated with the start of cooking is Homo erectus at 1.8 million years ago.
  • There are two pieces of evidence that Homo erectus started cooking
    • Anatomical changes related to diet.
    • The loss of traits related to climbing.

Chapter 5: Brain Foods

  • Our exceptional intelligence is the defining feature of our species and yet its origins have long been a puzzle.
  • There appears to be a link between brain size and social relationships.
  • E.g. Dolphins, elephants, hyenas, crows, and ants.
  • This is also known as the social brain hypothesis: large brains evolved because intelligence is a vital component of social life.
  • It also explains why species with bigger brains tend to have more complex societies.
  • If social intelligence is so important, then why do some group-living species have smaller brains than others?
  • Diet provides a major part of the answer.
  • The first requirement for evolving a big brain is the ability to fuel it and to do so reliably.
  • We are physiologically similar to primates with the only exception being our gut size and brain.
  • Gut size is linked to the quality of the diet since high energy-dense foods require smaller guts to digest.
  • Our small gut size provides the answer to what body part was traded off for a larger brain.
  • Primates that spend less energy fueling their guts can afford to power more brain tissue.
  • This is also known as the expensive tissue hypothesis: big brains are made possible by reducing expensive tissue such as gut tissue.
  • The first increase in brain size is attributed to eating meat, and the second increase is attributed to cooking.

Chapter 6: How Cooking Frees Men

  • Cooking made possible the sexual division of labor.
  • Sexual division refers to how women and men perform different yet complementary tasks.
  • The gendered division of labor is universal among humans.
  • Women and men spend their days seeking different kinds of food, but the foods they obtain are eaten by both sexes which is unusual.
  • Other animals usually don’t share their food with others but we are an exception.
  • The human family is the result of the reciprocity of hunting and gathering as women share what they’ve gathered and men share what they’ve hunted.
  • Since women gather roots and fruits, they can guarantee that their will be food for dinner while men go hunt for more exquisite and energy-dense foods like meat.
  • Another benefit of cooking is that it frees up time that would’ve been spent eating.
  • Chimpanzees spend more than six hours a day chewing while humans spend less than an hour a day chewing.
  • This reduction in chewing time is due to cooked foods being softer.
  • E.g. Boiling potatoes makes them softer, slow cooking tough meat makes it more tender, and frying fish turns the meat flaky.
  • Cooking frees up time for us to do other things.

Chapter 7: The Married Cook

  • Data collected from 185 cultures around the world shows that women tend to cook for the household. There were only three exceptions where women didn’t do the majority of cooking.
  • The rule that cooking is women’s work is consistent across the vast majority of human societies.
  • Why is that? It’s because when women cook it solves a basic problem.
  • The problem is that women need protection to cook and men provide this protection.
  • Men also get the bonus of guaranteeing their own meal as the woman cooks for the both of them.
  • Cooking also has the cultural effect of preventing people from stealing as a man can expect food from his wife which means he won’t steal another woman’s meal.
  • Another interesting element of cooking is that if a single woman shares her food with a single man, they are regarded as married since she cooked for him.
  • While women are forced to cook by men, it isn’t completely one-sided.
  • Women feed men to reward them for behaving well.
  • Food seems to drive a man’s marriage decision more than the need for a sexual partner.

Chapter 8: The Cook’s Journey

  • Cooked foods being softer means mothers can wean their baby off earlier.
  • This leads to faster recovery for the mother, a faster growing baby, and faster baby turnover.
  • Fire also has the benefit of keeping us warm which might explain why we are naked compared to other primates.

Epilogue

  • Criticism of the Atwater calorie system.